[Everolimus in Daily Clinical Practice Focusing to Oral Mucosa Damage Issues - Single Oncology Centre Experience within the Course of the Year 2016]. / Everolimus v denní klinické praxi se zamerením na problematiku postizení sliznice dutiny ústní - zkusenost onkologického centra v prubehu roku 2016.

BACKGROUND: Oral mucositis, mTOR associated stomatitis, is a major complication in everolimus (EVE) treatment with an incidence of 44-64%. The management of it in the daily practice has not been described enough, so far. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective analysis of patients treated with EVE in 2016 at our center, n = 42 patients (69% female), median age 66 (37-81) years, breast cancer in 20 (48%) and renal cell carcinoma in 22 (52%), starting EVE dose of 10mg/day in 34 (81%) and 5mg/day in 8 (19%) patients. RESULTS: Discomfort and/or dysgeusia without mucosa defects (grade 1 NCI-CTC) was in 4/34 (12%) patients, mucosal defects without oral intake limitation (grade 2) in 6/34 (17.5%), mucosal defects limiting oral intake (grade 3) in 7/34 (20.5%) patients. ACTIONS TAKEN: in grade 1 EVE dose reduced to 5mg/day in 1/4 affected patients, in grade 2 locally administered dexamethasone solution recommended in 2/6, reduction of EVE to 5mg/day in 4/6 (in two cases the reduced dose left because of complications recurrences), in grade 3 locally administered dexamehasone solution recommended in 5/7, transient reduction of EVE to 5mg/day in 1/7, permanent reduction of EVE in 5/7 (recurrent aphthous lesions), EVE terminated in 1/7. In patients with EVE starting dose of 5mg/day there was one case (1/8, 12.5%) of grade 2 complication requiring no intervention. The complications developed within 2-20 weeks after EVE initiation (median of 8 weeks). CONCLUSION: The incidence of stomatitis and its severity in this cohort is comparable with published trials data, it confirms the significant incidence of damage affecting the quality of life, oral intake and anti-cancer treatment in daily practice. The interventions used in groups of similarly affected patients appears slightly heterogeneous, influenced by individual physician approach. There is tendency not to interrupt the EVE treatment and keep it either in a dosage of 10 or 5mg/day if the oral damage is tolerable. Local treatment with dexamethasone is not yet fully exploited.Key words: everolimus - stomatitis - mucositis - oral cavity Supported by the grant of Ministry of Health of the Czech Republic - Conceptual Development of Research Organization (Faculty Hospital in Pilsen - FNPl, 00669806) and National Sustainability Program I (NPU I) No. LO1503 provided by the Ministry of Education Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic. The authors declare they have no potential conflicts of interest concerning drugs, products, or services used in the study. The Editorial Board declares that the manuscript met the ICMJE recommendation for biomedical papers.Submitted: 27. 2. 2017Accepted: 26. 3. 2017.

[IKARUS Project--incidence of bone events in breast cancer: retrospective analysis of patients in oncological centres in the Czech Republic and Slovakia]. / Projekt IKARUS--zjistení incidence kostních príhod u karcinomu prsu: retrospektivní analýza nemocných dispenzarizovaných v onkologických centrech Ceské a Slovenské republiky.

BACKGROUND: Bone incidents today represent, in terms of frequency and the overall effect on the quality of life of patients with breast cancer, a serious health problem. In a number of clinical studies bisphosphonates have been shown to have a positive impact on reducing the risk of bone events and therefore to be effective in the prevention of bone events. The primary objective of this project was to identify the incidence of bone events in patients with metastatic breast cancer treated in the Czech and Slovak Republics. SUBJECTS: Retrospective, multi-centre, non-interventional, epidemiological and explorative studies to identify the incidence of bone events in the defined group of patients and a description of the practice of prevention and treatment of skeletal events in the years 2000-2005. Enrolled were patients with advanced metastatic breast cancer diagnosed in 2000. METHODS AND RESULTS: Analysis of overall survival and survival to disease progression, analysis of patterns of treatment of bone events and the practice of the use of bisphosphonates in the prevention of bone events in metastatic skeleton affection in the normal conditions of clinical practice, analysis of patient compliance in the treatment with bisphosphonates, analysis of the time interval between the occurrence of bone metastases and the occurrence of bone events and, last but not least, survival analysis of patients in relation to bone events. CONCLUSION: This work has shown that the practice of treatment with bisphosphonates since 2000 and assessed the survival of patients with metastatic breast cancer.